Bill's Bytes

If I were asked to list what I consider to be the most un-American organizations extant, the American Civil Liberties Union would have to be very near the top of that list. Even their name is misleading, and their stance on illegal immigration is nothing but encouragement of the continuing violation of our immigration laws.

Consider the following statement from their site: “In dozens of cities across the country, local government officials are attempting to drive those they describe as ‘illegal immigrants’ out of their towns by punishing those who employ or rent to them“. I wonder, why do they place quotes around that term… isn’t that what they really are, illegal immigrants?

The ACLU evidently prefers the politically correct term “immigrants” instead of using the correct description of illegal immigrants… were these phony hucksters denied English classes in their law schools? Or are they puposefully trying to be deceptive? Any five year old can figure that one out.

The fact that they are really referring to the influx of illegals in most of their web site’s propaganda, despite the attempt to include a few examples of legal immigration, is their link titled “Know Your Rights… Immigrant Marches / Marchas de los Inmigrantes“.

We all know that legal immigrants are required to achieve a certain proficiency in English, so the only reason they include a link to a Spanish translation of their crud is to allow those who have entered illegally, and therefore usually learn no English, to be able to learn how to protect themselves from our laws.

They unashamedly boast about their legal challenges of local anti-illegal immigrant ordinances (misnaming them “Anti-Immigrant”) which have been enacted by duly elected American officials across the country who were put into their positions by the legal citizenry at the ballot box. It seems to me that if the ACLU were truly American in every sense of the word, they would be defending the traditional ideals and culture of our country, rather than apparently doing all they can to destroy them.

If the ACLU can use the plain term “immigrant” in place of “illegal immigrant”, then in my opinion it should be okay to ape their methods and refer them as the “American Civil Licentiousness Union” or maybe the “UnAmerican Civil Liberties Union”. Seems a more correct description to me, anyway.

Sad to say, even if the ACLU disbanded today, there are others who are all too eager to carry on its doubtful work: a Democratically controlled congress   that fervently wants to get the votes of up to 20 million illegals, if they are ever given amnesty and therefore citizenship, and a president who seems to be in bed with them on the issue. They seem hell bent to sell all of us and our culture down the drain in order to accomplish it.

It seems that idiocy continues to reign supreme in America, and the twisted spirit of the late 1960s is still alive and well. What brings me to that conclusion?

The Black Congressional Caucus, which is restricted to blacks only– whites need not apply. This is not considered a racist organization by our government or the MSM however– a clear double standard that spits upon true justice and equality.

Skeptical? Well, Pete Stark, D-Ca., who is white, tried and failed to join in 1975 because of his skin color. It seems clear that these two-faced bigots who routinely whine about racism are indeed the real racists today.

Take it straight from Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., the son of Rep. William Lacy Clay Sr., D-Mo., a co-founder of the caucus: “Mr. Cohen asked for admission, and he got his answer. He\’s white and the Caucus is black. It\’s time to move on. We have racial policies to pursue and we are pursuing them, as Mr. Cohen has learned. It\’s an unwritten rule. It\’s understood.” The “Mr. Cohen” that Clay mentions is Tennessee Democrat Stephen I. Cohen, a white liberal running in a majority African American district.

If that isn’t blatant racism, I’ll eat my hat. This caucus is composed entirely of blacks, who hypocritically claim to champion civil rights, and it’s bigotry is tolerated– if not blessed– by the U.S. government. This same government would undoubtedly label a White Caucus– if one existed– as racist, and would have its members investigated by the FBI for ties to everything from the Ku Klux Klan to Adolph Hitler.

Is America suffering from some type of mass insanity? We must be, if we continue to put up with this sort of bull excrement and its ilk– “hate crime” laws, The Jena 6 charade, and the assininely evil belief that only whites can be guilty of bigotry.

Whites seem to have been brainwashed over the years by the MSM, our schools and even our own government into believing that we are somehow responsible for black crime, black poverty and even for black racially-motivated attacks on whites, because we must be somehow naturally evil racists.

I maintain that exactly the opposite is true: by far the vast majority of racism is found in the black community, notably The Congressional Black Caucus, the SPLC, and also  organizations like La Raza. Rabble Rousers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, in my opinion, are also at the top of the list. I omitted the “Rev.” title on purpose, by thr way… I believe that if Sharpton and Jackson are really Christians, let alone “Reverent”, then the moon is made of green cheese, George Bush was an anti-illegal-immigration president and I have more money than Bill Gates.

There are some enlightened blacks who agree with my view, although they are seldom mentioned on the MSM. Elizabeth Wright, editor of the excellent black website Issues & Views, points out: “the terms ‘Black Power,’ ‘Black Supremacy,’ and ‘La Raza’ (The Race) are all trademarks that have long been approved by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office? Even the Black Panther Party’s slogan ‘Burn, Baby, Burn’ (which still evokes the threat of rioting and mayhem), had no problem winning official trademark recognition.”

Elizabeth further says that African Pride, Black Pride, Chippewa Pride, Cuban Pride, Indian Pride, Jewish Pride, Red Pride, and lots more — all aimed at acknowledging a race or ethnicity, are all terms approved by the U.S. government. She further reports that when Justin Moritz, a former law enforcement officer, applied to trademark the phrase “White Pride Country Wide,” he was rejected in no uncertain terms. Registration of the words was not only denied, but the phrase was ruled “offensive” and “immoral.” More succinctly, the trademark office claimed, “… the proposed mark consists of or comprises immoral or scandalous matter.”

That says a lot for what sadly passes these days for our government. Makes you wonder about the power of the racist Black Congressional Caucus and all the mentally retarded politicians currently in office that put up with it and pander to it, in the same way that they pander to the racist La Raza.

The MSM shares in promotion of this racist war against whites, under the ridiculous and hypocritical banner of touting the cause of true equality, of which they know nothing.

Racism on the part of white America exists mainly in the bigoted minds of groups like the Black Congressional Caucus, the MSM, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the ACLU and La Raza. In truth, real racism does run rampant in all these organizations, and it is racism against white Americans and our culture.

The civil rights movement has never sought equality and justice for all, in my opinion; instead it seeks to “turn the tables” and promote minority races and ethnicities to a class of citizenship with more rights than whites, through nefarious and deceitful tools such as affirmative action and unconstitutional “hate crimes” laws.

True equality is just that– true equality. If six whites beat hell out of a black, they need to pay the legal price; and the same should, but does not, hold true for six Jena blacks who beat a white kid. And Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and the MSM and their sorry kind really need to stop trying to make money and political hay out of such incidents. Their push for special treatment and status is the only thing that will ever bring back white organizations such as the Klan.

The members of the Black-only Congressional Caucus during the 110th Congress as published in Wikipedia is listed below.

Senate:

• Roland Burris,     Democrat —     Illinois

House of Representatives:

• Sanford Bishop,     Democrat —     Georgia
• Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.,     Democrat —     Illinois
• Corrine Brown,     Democrat —     Florida
• G. K. Butterfield,     Democrat —     North Carolina
• Julia Carson,     Democrat —     Indiana
• Yvette Clarke,     Democrat —     New York
• William Lacy Clay, Jr.,     Democrat —     Missouri
• Emanuel Cleaver, – 2nd Vice Chair     Democrat —     Missouri
• Jim Clyburn,     Democrat —     South Carolina
• John Conyers, Jr., – Dean     Democrat —     Michigan
• Elijah Cummings,     Democrat —     Maryland
• Artur Davis,     Democrat —     Alabama
• Danny K. Davis, – Secretary     Democrat —     Illinois
• Keith Ellison,     Democrat —     Minnesota
• Chaka Fattah,     Democrat —     Pennsylvania
• Al Green,     Democrat —     Texas
• Alcee Hastings,     Democrat —     Florida
• William J. Jefferson,     Democrat —     Louisiana
• Eddie Bernice Johnson,     Democrat —     Texas
• Hank Johnson,     Democrat —     Georgia
• Stephanie Tubbs Jones,     Democrat —     Ohio
• Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, – Chairwoman     Democrat —     Michigan
• Barbara Lee, – 1st Vice Chair     Democrat —     California
• Sheila Jackson Lee, – Whip     Democrat —     Texas
• John Lewis,     Democrat —     Georgia
• Kendrick Meek, – Foundation Chairman     Democrat —     Florida
• Gregory Meeks,     Democrat —     New York
• Gwen Moore,     Democrat —     Wisconsin
• Donald M. Payne,     Democrat —     New Jersey
• Charles B. Rangel,     Democrat —     New York
• Laura Richardson,     Democrat —     California
• Bobby Rush,     Democrat —     Illinois
• Bobby Scott,     Democrat —     Virginia
• David Scott,     Democrat —     Georgia
• Bennie Thompson,     Democrat —     Mississippi
• Edolphus Towns,     Democrat —     New York
• Maxine Waters,     Democrat —     California
• Diane Watson,     Democrat —     California
• Mel Watt,     Democrat —     North Carolina
• Albert Wynn,     Democrat —     Maryland

It may interest you to know that the membership seat that Roland Burris holds in the Black Caucus was held by our “post racial” president Barack Hussein Obama right up until the last election… how’s that for outright two-faced hypocrisy?

I make it a practice to respect, or to disrespect, the person and their character, not their color. I also realize that there are decent as well as putrid people in all races, and I am not saying there are no white bigots… but there are damn few these days, compared to most blacks who have been led to believe by political pukes like many of those listed above, that all their disappointments and failures in life can be blamed on the white race.

Racism and slavery are not inventions of the whites of European descent, by the way. Slavery began with the  Arabs millennia before the Portuguese and English ever thought of it, and they got the idea from black African tribes who had long been enslaving their fellow blacks. Don\’t take my word or it– read your history and do your own research. You won’t find the truth of this in most modern school libraries, though.

I am fed up, as a white man, with being the butt of race-baiters. And if Justin Moritz or anyone else forms a group called “White Pride Country Wide” or the like, I may join it if I so choose, whether the label is approved of by the government or not. The race card is frayed and worn out. Double standards such as “affirmative action” and the special privileged treatment for minorities, and the sick reasoning of those fools who support them, needs to be brought to a screeching halt. True equality must be made not only the rule of law, but the common code that our society lives by.

In a society now immersed in identity politics, where the education system and a reinforcing media work overtime in pummeling young minds with racially correct propaganda, there is little prospect that fairness will prevail in the near future …. Elizabeth Wright

‘

Ever heard of the Council on Foreign Relations?

I recently asked that question of a few acqaintances of mine, and to a person they said they thought it was a branch of the U.S. government…. Well it’s not, but it is a very powerful and dangerous  influence. Let’s reveal a little about this devious outfit.

Thirst for Justice has reported that Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the Council on Foreign Relations’ purpose as follows:

“The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it.”

And this comes from Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years: “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereingty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.”

Scary, to say the least. But there’s more, according to World Net Daily, quoting Phyllis Schlafly in an issue of Whistleblower, “This CFR document asserts that President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin ‘committed their governments’ to this goal when they met at Bush’s ranch and at Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the ‘Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America’ and assigned ‘working groups’ to fill in the details.

It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American Summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet ‘vigilantes’ on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.”

That seems to explain the haughty indifference of the Senate and the President toward the growing resentment of the American people over the granting of amnesty to the invasion of “immigrants” into our country. This may indeed be done by the very people who we have elected to represent us. Any politician who will grant amnesty of any kind to these illegal interlopers should at least be voted out of office, if not impeached.

More recently, the Lou Dobbs Tonight TV show has reported that the Bush Administration has decided to “back-door” the creation of the North American Union political entity that would effectively erase our borders with Mexico and Canada and create several super-regional governing bodies that could have jurisdiction over the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court.

All of this is evidently to be done through governmental regulations, making it possible to never have to bring the issue before the American people for a clear referendum or vote.  This all seems to me to be yet another instance of the incredible arrogance of our current sorry crop of elitist (mis)leaders, who seem hell bent on doing what they want to with this country, whether we, the people, like it or not.

I can’t remember a time when our representative form of government has cared so little for the wishes of the people that they represent on issues ranging from the outsourcing of our jobs to  this  grandiose  and very dangerous scheme. Never before has it been so important that these elitists be voted out of office, from the lowest representative to the Executive branch.

Do yourself a favor and read the full sorry story at Human Events Online and tune in to the Lou Dobbs Tonight show on CNN.  Lou has promised to keep following this story and the actions of our sorry-ass Washington politicos.

• In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way. ~ Franklin D Roosevelt

January 19, 2009, will be the 202nd birthday of General Robert E. Lee. While many in this era of revisionist history and liberal social manipulation may either not know anything about who this man really was or what he stood for, he was indeed a great American. Winston Churchill called Lee “one of the noblest Americans who ever lived.”

President-to-be Abraham Lincoln offered command of the Union Army to Lee in 1861, but Lee refused, not willing to raise arms against his native state of Virginia. After an all-night battle of conscience, on his knees in prayer, Robert Edward Lee reluctantly resigned his commission and headed home to Virginia. He soon served as adviser to Confederate President Jefferson Davis, and then commanded the legendary Army of Northern Virginia.

In answer to questions about his decision, he said “All the South has ever desired was that the Union, as established by our Forefathers, should be preserved, and that the government, as originally organized, should be administered in purity and truth.”

The Hall of Fame for great Americans was opened in 1900, in New York City. While over a thousand names were submitted, only 29 received a majority vote from the electors. General Robert E. Lee , 30 years after his death, was among those honored.

• I grieve for posterity, for American principles and for American liberty…. Robert E. Lee, 1868

(Reprinted with permission from Sitebilder)

Most spam will not come to your inbox without your help, or sometimes the “help” of your ISP. I use Charter cable– because it’s the only show in town– and their spam protection fairly sucks. But other than your Internet provider selling your email address to spammers, it’s a simple fact that most people invite most of it themselves.

Spammers don’t have any magical way of getting your email address, they usually use information that you have provided to various sources, who in turn either sell that information, give it away to business partners, or store it on non-secure databases.

It is probably next to impossible to prevent all spam, but it is possible to limit what spam you receive, to a large extent. We won’t go into a lot of the details of the methods spammers use to get your email address, since that would only serve to give more would-be spammers information. However, there are some basic things you need to know in order to protect your inbox from garbage, so we’ll start there.

Spam Bots
A spam bot is akin to search engine bots (short for robots), in that they roam the web looking for the “mailto:” links that you put on your web site. Any email address they find is then added to their database. So what can you do? You can disguise your email addresses by using one of the many PHP or JavaScript programs freely available on the web. You’ll find a free script in the JavaScripts section titled “Hide Email Links from Spam Bots” on This Page that will do the job.

Get a Catch-all E-mail Account
By far the most common way that people give away their email addresses to spammers is by filling out forms on the web. You can never assume that the website you are handing out your email address to will not disclose it, or in many cases, sell it outright. One way to protect yourself is to get one of the free web based email accounts from a site like Yahoo, and always use that address when filling out forms. You will have to go to that account and delete all the trash from time to time, but at least the crud will all be in one place, and not mixed in with your personal email.

Considering the above, here are a few things to be wary of:

*   Buying things online

*   Registering software or hardware

*   Joining forums, newsgroups, taking newsletters

*   Most “free” e-card sites make their money by selling not only your email address, but also those of your friends

*   Registering with singles and dating websites

*   Participating in polls or feedbacks, even with the major news web sites

I know that the points just mentioned are pretty limiting, but if you don’t want to wade through tons of spam every day, they must be considered. If you follow the guidelines your spam will diminish, but there is no way to be 100% spam-free that I know of, especially if you have your own registered domain.

Anti-Spam Tools
If there’s a really good anti-spam app out there anywhere, I haven’t found it. I have tried almost a dozen different ones, and every one of them has a serious drawback, at least as far as I am concerned: they will also delete personal mail, to varying degrees. Almost all of the current anti-spam apps look for certain keywords which they use to tag your mail as spam. If you were running one of these spam filters and this article was an email that was sent to you, the chances are that you might not get it, since the content would probably cause it to be tagged as spam. If you know of one that works 100% of the time, let me know and I’ll post it here.

John McCain, predictably following in his mentor Bush’s sorry tradition, has announced his plan for national health care. McCain wants to five families a $5,000 tax credit to buy health insurance, and $2,500 for individuals. The cost estimate for this is estimated at $3.6 trillion.

To cover the cost of that, he proposes elimination of the tax breaks employers now get for offering insurance. 

While his plan sounds no worse at first thought than those proposed by Clinton and Obama, it completely fails to take into account the plight of the increasing number of Americans who are losing their jobs to outsourcing, and joining the ranks of the unemployed.

Former middle class workers by the tens of thousands who have been out of work by government condoned outsourcing long enough to run out of unemployment compensation will not have any benefit from McCain’s plan because they are in a downward spiral towards a poverty level that is too low to pay enough taxes for any type of tax break.

But Republicans of McCain’s ilk don’t seem to worry about that though, any more than they worry about the elderly who have been getting Social Security increases of 2.3 %, which is more than eaten by their increased Medicare  costs, insane gas prices, and now soaring food prices.

It’s a damn shame that we don’t have any better choices for the office of president than the three pitiful examples now foisted on us by both political parties, neither of which are truly concerned about the average American, no matter what the phonies say in their mad grab for power.
 

Bill Gates may be the world’’s richest man, but when it comes to loyalty to his fellow countrymen he is the poorest of the poor. During his recent congressional talk, in which some members of congress did everything but kiss his butt, Gates claimed that Microsoft and companies like his could be even\r\nmore successful if the United States would only let more foreign\r\nworkers in.

Well, no kidding, Mr. Gates! At the expense of American workers this dud could certainly do better by hiring foreign workers at lower wages than most Americans will work for. I wonder what Gates and Microcrap will be asking for next– abolishment of child labor laws?
 

Sadly reminiscent of the 1960s, the current media coverage of the so-called  Jena 6 is about as honest and straightforward as your average political campaign.

Only in America could 6 thugs gang up on one white boy and beat him into uncnsiouness– and then continue beating him– and still have the mainstream media at their defense, calling the arrest and sentencing of the six black attackers "racism".

To truly objective minds (CNN take notice), there is absolutely nothing racist about convicting and sentencing those found guilty of such an atrocity. The fact that this incident happened is disputed by nobody. But the old liberal sickness of times past seems to be alive and well today, as evidenced by the inane assumption that if blacls are convicted of any crime agaiinst whites, and are susequently held legally accountable, then of course there simply must be racism involved… just ask professsional rabble rouser Al Sharpton.

This type of sick thinking, promoted ad nauseum by  mainstream media interests masquerading as news reporters, erroneously takes it for granted that any racism involved is never on the part of blacks, but only on the part of whites. Their brainwashing works to some extent; there are still millions of ignoramuses in the USA who simplistically believe that if the talking face on CNN or MSNBC says it ’s so, then it really has to be so.

Justin Barker, the white victim, was cold-cocked from behind, knocked unconscious and beaten and stomped by six black athletes, now made famous by the liberal media. While Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and CNN ’s Rick Sanchez have made much ado about "nooses" being hung on a schoolyard tree, inferring that the victim had something to do with putting theme there, the fact is that the noose hanging incident happened three months before the attack of the six black racists on Barker.

Yes, I said "black racists". Black racism is a very prevalent fact that is almost universally ignored in  today ’s politically correct unreality. Black racism is encouraged and almost blessed by the mainstream media ’s treatment (or mistreatment) of such matters as the Jena incident. 

As evidence of this, consider the statement by CNN ’s muckraker Rick Sanchez earlier today: "Why should a schoolyard fight keep this teenager behind bars?"

That statement by Sanchez is either an outright lie or the result of very poor research into the truth of the matter, and if the latter is the case, then Sanchez is at best irresponsible in declaring such an untruth as if it were fact to millions of viewers. However, as black commentator Jason Whitlock reports, "There was no ’schoolyard fight ‘ as a result of nooses being hung on a whites-only tree."

Read the rest

While Gilmer Hernandez, a Texas deputy sheriff, was being persecuted prosecuted and Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean remain imprisoned– for doing their duty– where was President Bush?

He was again in Mexico, spouting more hype: “The United States respects rule of law, but in the debate on migration,  I remind my fellow citizens that family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River.”

I call that statement “hype” because if the rule of law were indeed followed by the Bush administration, our southern border would have long ago been secured. Furthermore, the rosy bit about “family values” is clearly intended to point to Mexico… does Mr. Bush fully realize that he was elected by legal Americans, not by Mexicans? That it is his sworn duty to uphold our constitution and laws, including our immigration laws?

I believe he fully realizes those points, and also that he fully intends to continue to ignore them wherever they oppose the wishes of himself, his advisors and  corporate interests. While he is clearly sympathetic to the plight of the millions of illegals that his administration has allowed through inaction, he seems either unaware or downright callous toward the plight of the American worker– those who elected him and who he should, by every moral, ethical and legal reason be supporting– rather than those who violate our laws.

While he defends the dismissal of federal attorneys by Gonzalez, he wholly supports the repugnant actions of Johnny Sutton. Sutton has prosecuted the Patrol agents and the deputy mentioned above, while granting immunity to dope peddlers. If you believe there is something basically rotten here, give yourself a gold star.

Our country and the people’s will has never before in history been so blatantly ignored and ill-served as it has been by this administration and this congress. God help us if we do not stop voting these characters into office. Both Republican and Democratic pukes politicians clearly seem to be more loyal to their respective parties and to the corporate interests who finance their misconduct than to their country.

We can only hope and pray that they don’t completely ruin our way of life before they can hopefully be booted out at the next elections– or better yet– impeached.